Für diese Tätigkeit liegen 5 Quellenbelege vor. Keiner untersucht diese Tätigkeit unmittelbar; die Aussagen stammen aus breiterem Kontext.
Das Bearbeiten der Fälle verschiebt sich, das hoheitliche Entscheiden bleibt in menschlicher Hand.
Die vorbereitende, sachbearbeitende Seite dieser Tätigkeit ist von KI berührt — allerdings ungleich verteilt: Manche Teilschritte lassen sich unterstützen, andere bleiben unangetastet. Der eigentliche hoheitliche Kern, das Prüfen und Entscheiden mit Verantwortung, gilt als wenig betroffen; hinzu kommt, dass Institutionen zögern, solche Entscheidungen überhaupt an Maschinen zu delegieren. Wo Routineschritte automatisiert werden, kann die Nachfrage dennoch sinken, ohne dass die Tätigkeit selbst ersetzt wird.
Diese allgemeine Einordnung ist keine Messung in jedem einzelnen Beruf.
Eine fehlende Bewertung bedeutet nicht, dass die Tätigkeit nicht betroffen ist.
Exposed: Gradient 2 (Moderate exposure, high task variability) · 0.4 ≤ μ < 0.5 and μ + σ ≥ 0.5 · Moderate occupational AI exposure, with high task-level variability. These occupations include a mix of some tasks that are exposed to GenAI and others not at risk, making the impact uneven. / Gradient 2 3352 Government Tax and Excise Officials 0.49 0.12 / Gradient 2 3353 Government Social Benefits Officials 0.45 0.07 / Gradient 2 3354 Government Licensing Officials 0.43 0.07
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (ILO Working Paper 140) · 2025 · ILO WP 140, Table 5, PDF-S. 41 (gedr. 38); ILO WP 140, Table A1, PDF-S. 52 (3352); PDF-S. 53 (3353, 3354)
Not Exposed 2612 Judges 0.31 0.08 / Not Exposed 3355 Police Inspectors and Detectives 0.23 0.07 / Occupations where most tasks remain relatively unaffected by GenAI, with low task variability and a stable low mean exposure score.
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (ILO Working Paper 140) · 2025 · ILO WP 140, Table A1, PDF-S. 58 (gedr. 55) [2612]; PDF-S. 59 [3355]; ILO WP 140, Table 5, PDF-S. 41 (gedr. 38) [Definition]
Gradients 1-3 comprise occupations where the automation of specific tasks is limited, and some degree of task variability exists. As such, the ‚bundle of tasks' that constitutes occupations acts as a buffer against full automation. However, this does not mean that demand for these occupations will remain stable, as the efficiencies gained from introducing technology may mean that fewer workers are needed. If efforts are not made to help such jobs evolve with GenAI and integrate new tasks, even partial automation of existing tasks could lead to a decline in overall job demand in occupations found in higher exposure gradients.
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (ILO Working Paper 140) · 2025 · ILO WP 140, Abschnitt 10/11, PDF-S. 47 (gedr. 44)
An important aspect also concerns the institutional and societal acceptance of automating tasks and occupations – even when technically feasible. […] Similarly, financial institutions might hesitate to fully delegate decisions such as mortgage approvals or business plan evaluations to AI systems, preferring to retain human judgement, oversight and accountability.
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (ILO Working Paper 140) · 2025 · ILO WP 140, PDF-S. 47 (gedr. 44)
Business process skills have also seen a reduction in demand from establishments more exposed to AI. On average across countries in the sample, demand for business process skills declined by 3.5 percentage points for a one standard deviation increase in AI exposure […] Business Process skills include clerical and administrative tasks along with sales and customer service. / Skills and tasks that can be roughly described as clerical tasks were the sub-group of skills that saw the largest reduction in demand. Demand for clerical skills declined by slightly more than 2 percentage points for a one standard deviation increase in establishment-level AI exposure […] The most frequently demanded skills in clerical tasks are administrative support and record keeping.
Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Demand for Skills in the Labour Market (OECD AI Papers No. 14) · 2024 · OECD AI Papers No. 14, Abschnitt 4, PDF-S. 36 (gedr. 36)
Diese Lösungen unterstützen die Tätigkeit in einem passenden fachlichen Kontext. Das ist keine Aussage über ihre Eignung oder gemessene Wirkung in jedem zugeordneten Beruf.
Zitierhinweis: SapientShift, Tätigkeit T-024 „Anträge und Fälle hoheitlich prüfen und entscheiden“, https://sapientshift.com/taetigkeiten/antraege-und-faelle-hoheitlich-pruefen-und-entscheiden. Methodik und Grenzen.